<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>Comments for Personal Blog of Samer Forzley</title>
<link />
<title>Comment on iPad = Kindle = Who cares by Lesley</title>
<link />
<title>Comment on iPad = Kindle = Who cares by Lily</title>
<link />
<title>Comment on The Shark Tank – Twitter Edition by whiteshark0121</title>
<link />
<title>Comment on Are you a twitter addict? 10 signs you maybe by Tweets that mention Are you a twitter addict? 10 signs you maybe | Personal Blog of Samer Forzley -- Topsy.com</title>
<link />
<title>Comment on The Shark Tank – Twitter Edition by Tweets that mention The Shark Tank - Twitter Edition - How not to value a company | Personal Blog of Samer Forzley -- Topsy.com</title>
<link />
<title>Comment on Doing a Social Media 180 by Anna Barcelos</title>
<link />
<title>Comment on Twitter follow back basics by senderok</title>
<link />
<title>Comment on Twitter follow back basics by Samer Forzley</title>
<link />
<title>Comment on Twitter follow back basics by senderok</title>
<link />
<title>Comment on Twitter follow back basics by senderok</title>
<link />
</head>
<body>
http://www.samerforzley.com Talking about things Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:49:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 http://www.samerforzley.com/2010/01/28/ipad-kindle-who-cares/comment-page-1/#comment-101 Lesley Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:49:25 +0000 http://www.samerforzley.com/?p=285#comment-101 I would never use a digital book, I'm all about the paper. I'm still mad that the French teacher told the grade 4 class they can do their dictee practice, on the Nintendo DS! I'm sure an iPad will end up in our house - but not as a replacement to books. 
<![CDATA[<p>I would never use a digital book, I&#8217;m all about the paper.<br />
I&#8217;m still mad that the French teacher told the grade 4 class they can do their dictee practice, on the Nintendo DS! </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure an iPad will end up in our house &#8211; but not as a replacement to books.</p>
]]>
 http://www.samerforzley.com/2010/01/28/ipad-kindle-who-cares/comment-page-1/#comment-98 Lily Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:21:26 +0000 http://www.samerforzley.com/?p=285#comment-98 I don't like the eReaders either. Sure they're cool and are easier to carry around, but I like to be surrounded by books, especially books that I have spent money on and have enjoyed countless times over and over again. So I feel you when you say "there is nothing like reading a book". 
<![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like the eReaders either. Sure they&#8217;re cool and are easier to carry around, but I like to be surrounded by books, especially books that I have spent money on and have enjoyed countless times over and over again. So I feel you when you say &#8220;there is nothing like reading a book&#8221;.</p>
]]>
 http://www.samerforzley.com/2010/01/21/the-shark-tank-twitter-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-97 whiteshark0121 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:39:00 +0000 http://www.samerforzley.com/?p=280#comment-97 I like watching Shark Tank, sometimes I visit www.SharkTankTVShow.com for some recap and expert advice on a specific episode. 
<![CDATA[<p>I like watching Shark Tank, sometimes I visit <a href="http://www.SharkTankTVShow.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.SharkTankTVShow.com</a> for some recap and expert advice on a specific episode.</p>
]]>
 http://www.samerforzley.com/2010/01/25/are-you-a-twitter-addict-10-signs-you-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-96 Tweets that mention Are you a twitter addict? 10 signs you maybe | Personal Blog of Samer Forzley -- Topsy.com Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:11:21 +0000 http://www.samerforzley.com/?p=283#comment-96 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Stacey Diffin-Lafleu and Samer Forzley, Samer Forzley. Samer Forzley said: Published a new blog post: Are you a twitter addict?... http://www.samerforzley.com/2010/01/25/are-you-a-twitter-addict-10-signs-you-maybe/ [...] 
<![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Stacey Diffin-Lafleu and Samer Forzley, Samer Forzley. Samer Forzley said: Published a new blog post: Are you a twitter addict?&#8230; <a href="http://www.samerforzley.com/2010/01/25/are-you-a-twitter-addict-10-signs-you-maybe/" rel="nofollow">http://www.samerforzley.com/2010/01/25/are-you-a-twitter-addict-10-signs-you-maybe/</a> [...]</p>
]]>
 http://www.samerforzley.com/2010/01/21/the-shark-tank-twitter-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-95 Tweets that mention The Shark Tank - Twitter Edition - How not to value a company | Personal Blog of Samer Forzley -- Topsy.com Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:26:03 +0000 http://www.samerforzley.com/?p=280#comment-95 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rebecca S, Samer Forzley and Samer Forzley, Samer Forzley. Samer Forzley said: New Blog Post The Shark Tank - Twitter Edition http://tinyurl.com/yfx48jf [...] 
<![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rebecca S, Samer Forzley and Samer Forzley, Samer Forzley. Samer Forzley said: New Blog Post The Shark Tank &#8211; Twitter Edition <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yfx48jf" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yfx48jf</a> [...]</p>
]]>
 http://www.samerforzley.com/2010/01/06/doing-the-social-media-180/comment-page-1/#comment-91 Anna Barcelos Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:04:16 +0000 http://www.samerforzley.com/?p=253#comment-91 I liked our exchange today Samer because it really made me think. You had an excellent point about a well-known social media person at a brand potentially leaving the company and going to another brand. How would the world now view that same person and new brand they're representing? Would people say, "He/she was great at the last company and really enriched the brand, let's see what they can do for this one?" or "I don't know if I can easily accept the fact that this person who represented Brand A is now representing Brand B, especially if it's a competitor." So I thought about it by going back to "life before social media." People leave companies all the time as I said. Some cannot work for competitors due to non-compete agreements they signed with the companies. Others cannot disclose "company secrets" with non-disclosure agreements. How does it work now that social media is in the mix? Well the major difference is you're out in the open being seen and heard by all. More than ever people can get to know you, how you engage/interact with people and what you say about your company or in general. This creates a certain perception and bam, you're that brand. We see and even interact with people from Dell, Kodak, Comcast and other brands on social networks and at the end of the day they are people (who represent these companies) like us. One thing we both agreed on strongly was that if you're a new person at a new brand, you have to earn trust for yourself and the brand. A case in point is, I started a position at a company six months ago and didn't just walk into this position easily. It was a newly created position for me in a traditional, conservative environment. No one knew who I was and what I did. It's a continuouos education process, tough at times, but like anything you have to persevere and prove yourself to earn respect. In the end, it really is a personal decision. Unfortunately, I do not know any folks who formerly represented a prominent brand and went to a new one but would love to get their point of view. Let's hope we do. You are right. This all gets forgotten in the end (Tiger who? ha). Thanks for blogging about this point. It's a great one. 
<![CDATA[<p>I liked our exchange today Samer because it really made me think. You had an excellent point about a well-known social media person at a brand potentially leaving the company and going to another brand. How would the world now view that same person and new brand they&#8217;re representing? Would people say, &#8220;He/she was great at the last company and really enriched the brand, let&#8217;s see what they can do for this one?&#8221; or &#8220;I don&#8217;t know if I can easily accept the fact that this person who represented Brand A is now representing Brand B, especially if it&#8217;s a competitor.&#8221;</p>
<p>So I thought about it by going back to &#8220;life before social media.&#8221; People leave companies all the time as I said.  Some cannot work for competitors due to non-compete agreements they signed with the companies. Others cannot disclose &#8220;company secrets&#8221; with non-disclosure agreements. How does it work now that social media is in the mix? Well the major difference is you&#8217;re out in the open being seen and heard by all. More than ever people can get to know you, how you engage/interact with people and what you say about your company or in general. This creates a certain perception and bam, you&#8217;re that brand. We see and even interact with people from Dell, Kodak, Comcast and other brands on social networks and at the end of the day they are people (who represent these companies) like us.</p>
<p>One thing we both agreed on strongly was that if you&#8217;re a new person at a new brand, you have to earn trust for yourself and the brand.  A case in point is, I started a position at a company six months ago and didn&#8217;t just walk into this position easily. It was a newly created position for me in a traditional, conservative environment. No one knew who I was and what I did. It&#8217;s a continuouos education process, tough at times, but like anything you have to persevere and prove yourself to earn respect.</p>
<p>In the end, it really is a personal decision. Unfortunately, I do not know any folks who formerly represented a prominent brand and went to a new one but would love to get their point of view. Let&#8217;s hope we do.</p>
<p>You are right. This all gets forgotten in the end (Tiger who? ha).</p>
<p>Thanks for blogging about this point. It&#8217;s a great one.</p>
]]>
 http://www.samerforzley.com/2009/02/03/twitter-follow-back-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-27 senderok Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:56:32 +0000 http://samerforzley.com/?p=157#comment-27 I agree. I have blocked 1000s of followers on various accounts. I don't let someone follow who is obviously a spammer because I know they're likely to try to unfollow/refollow, which really wastes time. Pro spammers will either do that or block you for not following them, which can hurt your reputation, so I just block as soon as I see someone who obviously isn't going to really read anything I write. This keeps the follower count down below the count of those I follow. 
<![CDATA[<p>I agree. I have blocked 1000s of followers on various accounts. I don&#8217;t let someone follow who is obviously a spammer because I know they&#8217;re likely to try to unfollow/refollow, which really wastes time.</p>
<p>Pro spammers will either do that or block you for not following them, which can hurt your reputation, so I just block as soon as I see someone who obviously isn&#8217;t going to really read anything I write. This keeps the follower count down below the count of those I follow.</p>
]]>
 http://www.samerforzley.com/2009/02/03/twitter-follow-back-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-26 Samer Forzley Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:46:18 +0000 http://samerforzley.com/?p=157#comment-26 Senderok I will only make one comment on your replies and that comment relates to "I see the author has not yet followed more than 700, which means he wasn’t interested to sell his firm’s message to a group that he targeted so much as he has wanted people to find him on their own. It looks “good” that he has 1000 more followers than follows, but they are people who, like him, aren’t even approaching the 2000 follow limit so they can afford it that he doesn’t follow them back. They can find him interesting and that is that." any one who follows me on twitter can judge my tweets. Nothing to hide on twitter. I rarely push my company on my account, its a personal account and that is that. I dont follow everyone because most accounts are bots or fake. if twitter deleted all the junk accounts, i am sure my follow to follower ration would be close. 
<![CDATA[<p>Senderok</p>
<p>I will only make one comment on your replies and that comment relates to</p>
<p>&#8220;I see the author has not yet followed more than 700, which means he wasn’t interested to sell his firm’s message to a group that he targeted so much as he has wanted people to find him on their own. It looks “good” that he has 1000 more followers than follows, but they are people who, like him, aren’t even approaching the 2000 follow limit so they can afford it that he doesn’t follow them back. They can find him interesting and that is that.&#8221;</p>
<p>any one who follows me on twitter can judge my tweets. Nothing to hide on twitter. I rarely push my company on my account, its a personal account and that is that.</p>
<p>I dont follow everyone because most accounts are bots or fake. if twitter deleted all the junk accounts, i am sure my follow to follower ration would be close.</p>
]]>
 http://www.samerforzley.com/2009/02/03/twitter-follow-back-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-25 senderok Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:13:36 +0000 http://samerforzley.com/?p=157#comment-25 I forgot to add that, yes, real estate tweeters, anyone whose last tweet was about teeth whitening or getting more followers or anyone who constantly tweets about their business that I am not interested in (such as a dog kennel) or has nothing but recycled quotes gets no follow back. 
<![CDATA[<p>I forgot to add that, yes, real estate tweeters, anyone whose last tweet was about teeth whitening or getting more followers or anyone who constantly tweets about their business that I am not interested in (such as a dog kennel) or has nothing but recycled quotes gets no follow back.</p>
]]>
 http://www.samerforzley.com/2009/02/03/twitter-follow-back-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-24 senderok Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:04:19 +0000 http://samerforzley.com/?p=157#comment-24 Note to that last sentence...it is not as if I or anyone else actually *will* read that person's tweets. We miss the majority of the tweets of even the people we are most interested in. We only see 4% of the tweets of the average person we follow and that is a liberal estimate. Here is whom I unfollow quickly. Note that I am assuming that the stream is not meant to be read (cannot be read logically unless I only follow 10 people) and anyone I find interesting I am going to visit on my own regardless of whether I am following them - whether I follow someone is irrelevant to whether I read their Twitter page regularly or not: 1) If someone tweets a lot and follows a lot fewer than follow them...I give them only a week or less to have noticed me as a new follower, possibly read my tweets and made the decision not to follow. That tells me that the person is probably not a potential partner. If they are really potentially important, I will unfollow and then, months later, try a new follow. Note that my follow behavior bears no relation to whether I regularly read their page or not. I regularly read @TheMediaIsDying and major media accounts for instance, but I would never follow them because they don't follow back and I'd never see their tweets when I want to see them anyway. 2) If someone is really important, I will RT what they say that is interesting. I often do this at the moment I unfollow them so they are given one last chance to follow back. If nothing I do to help them spread their message causes them to follow back, I conclude they don't know how to use Twitter and think they don't need help spreading their company's message. I may consider not to approach them in real life in favor of the many, many potential partners who had followed back and interacted. Note again that I may still regularly read the account of someone I don't follow because of a non-follow attitude of the other account like @themediaisdying or @deliverability. Following and reading bear almost no relation to each other. The stream runs too fast for this not to be so. 
<![CDATA[<p>Note to that last sentence&#8230;it is not as if I or anyone else actually *will* read that person&#8217;s tweets. We miss the majority of the tweets of even the people we are most interested in. We only see 4% of the tweets of the average person we follow and that is a liberal estimate.</p>
<p>Here is whom I unfollow quickly. Note that I am assuming that the stream is not meant to be read (cannot be read logically unless I only follow 10 people) and anyone I find interesting I am going to visit on my own regardless of whether I am following them &#8211; whether I follow someone is irrelevant to whether I read their Twitter page regularly or not:</p>
<p>1) If someone tweets a lot and follows a lot fewer than follow them&#8230;I give them only a week or less to have noticed me as a new follower, possibly read my tweets and made the decision not to follow. That tells me that the person is probably not a potential partner. If they are really potentially important, I will unfollow and then, months later, try a new follow.</p>
<p>Note that my follow behavior bears no relation to whether I regularly read their page or not. I regularly read @TheMediaIsDying and major media accounts for instance, but I would never follow them because they don&#8217;t follow back and I&#8217;d never see their tweets when I want to see them anyway.</p>
<p>2) If someone is really important, I will RT what they say that is interesting. I often do this at the moment I unfollow them so they are given one last chance to follow back. If nothing I do to help them spread their message causes them to follow back, I conclude they don&#8217;t know how to use Twitter and think they don&#8217;t need help spreading their company&#8217;s message. I may consider not to approach them in real life in favor of the many, many potential partners who had followed back and interacted.</p>
<p>Note again that I may still regularly read the account of someone I don&#8217;t follow because of a non-follow attitude of the other account like @themediaisdying or @deliverability. Following and reading bear almost no relation to each other. The stream runs too fast for this not to be so.</p>
]]>
</body>
</html>